From squirrel@echelon.alias.net Tue Mar 16 13:10:04 1999
Path: newscene.newscene.com!novia!dca1-hub1.news.digex.net!digex!worldfeed.news.gte.net!dallas-news-feed2.bbnplanet.com!news.gtei.net!news.lava.net!anon.lcs.mit.edu!nym.alias.net!mail2news-x2!mail2news
Date: 16 Mar 1999 20:10:04 -0000
Subject: FZ BIBLE 15/35 SOLUTION TO ENTRAPMENT 9TH ACC
Newsgroups: alt.religion.scientology,alt.clearing.technology
From: Secret Squirrel <squirrel@echelon.alias.net>
Comments: Please report problems with this automated remailing service to
	<squirrel-admin@echelon.alias.net>. The message sender's identity
	is unknown, unlogged, and not replyable.
Message-ID: <b4fb695b58c5e0cdee0a4cc0bed7f38b@anonymous.poster>
Mail-To-News-Contact: postmaster@nym.alias.net
Organization: mail2news@nym.alias.net
Lines: 1204
Xref: newscene.newscene.com alt.religion.scientology:689970 alt.clearing.technology:76109

FREEZONE BIBLE ASSOCIATION TECH POST

9th ACC - THE SOLUTION TO ENTRAPMENT CASSETTES 15/35

Our purpose is to promote religious freedom and the Scientology
Religion by spreading the Scientology Tech across the internet.

The Cof$ abusively suppresses the practice and use of
Scientology Tech by FreeZone Scientologists.  It misuses the
copyright laws as part of its suppression of religious freedom.

The writings of LRH form our Old Testament just as the writings
of Judiasm form the Old Testament of Christianity.

We might not be good and obedient Scientologists according
to the definitions of the Cof$ whom we are in protest against.

But the Christians are not good and obedient Jews and yet
are allowed to have their old testament regardless of any
Jewish opinion.

We ask for the same rights, namely to practice our religion
as we see fit and to have access to our holy scriptures
without fear of the Cof$ copyright terrorists.

We ask for others to help in our fight.  Even if you do
not believe in Scientology or the Scientology Tech, we hope
that you do believe in religious freedom and will choose
to aid us for that reason.

Thank You,

The FZ Bible Association

**************************************************


9TH ACC CONTENTS

December 1954 to January 1955 in Phoenix, Arizona.

Based on the solution to entrappment cassette version.

F# = File number (** = not available)
O# = Original Number (according to the master list posted by Pilot)
REN = As renumbered in the Solution to Entrappment cassettes

F# O#  REN  DATE  TITLE

01  1   1  Dec  6 Introduction to 9th ACC: Havingness
02  2   2  Dec  7 The Essence of Auditing, Know to Mystery Scale
03  3   3  Dec  8 Rundown on Six Basics
04  4   4  Dec  9 Communication Formula
05  5   5  Dec 10 The Practice of Dianetics and Scientology
06  6   6  Dec 13 Conduct of the Auditor
07  7   7  Dec 14 Mechanics of Communication
08  8   8  Dec 15 Havingness
09  9   9  Dec 16 Pan-determinism and One-way Flows
10  9A 10  Dec 17 Hist. & Dev. of Processes: Games & Limitations in Games
11  9B 10A Dec 17 History and Development of Processes: Q&A Period
12 10  11  Dec 20 Games (Fighting)
13 11  12  Dec 21 Anatomy of Games -- Part I
14 11A 12A Dec 21 Anatomy of Games -- Part II
15 12  13  Dec 22 One-way Flows in Processing
16 12A 13A Dec 22 One-way Flows in Processing: Question and Answer Period
17 13  14  Dec 23 Havingness and Communication Formulas
** 13A --  Dec 23 After Lecture Comments   
18 14  15  Dec 24 Pan-determinism
19 14A 15A Dec 24 Pan-determinism: Question and Answer Period
20 15  16  Dec 27 Training New People
** 15A --  Dec 27 Curiosa from Dianetics 55!
21 16  17  Jan  3 Auditing Requirements, Differences
22 16A 18  Jan  4 Time
** 16AA -  Jan  4 Q&A Period
23 17  19  Jan  5 Auditing at Optimum
24 18  20  Jan  6 Exteriorization
25 19  21  Jan  7 Elementary Material: Know to Mystery Scale
26 20  22  Jan 10 Education: Goals in Society -- Adult Education
27 21  23  Jan 11 Fundamentals of Auditing
** 21A --  Jan 11 Auditors' Conference
28 22  24  Jan 12 Definitions: Glossary of Terms -- Part I
29 23  25  Jan 13 Definitions: Glossary of Terms -- Part II
30 24  26  Jan 14 Definitions: Glossary of Terms -- Part III
31 25  27  Jan 17 Auditing Demonstration: Six Basics in Action
** 25A --  Jan 17 Auditors' Conference
32 26  28  Jan 18 Auditing Demonstration: Spotting Spots
** 26A --  Jan 18 Auditors' Conference
33 27  29  Jan 19 Auditing Demonstration: Exteriorization
34 28  30  Jan 20 Background Music to Living
35 29  31  Jan 21 Axioms: Laws of Consideration -- What an Axiom Is

Note that 6 of the 9 discussion periods (Q&A periods, Auditors'
Conferences, etc.) were omitted from the cassettes, leaving us
with only 35 files instead of the 41 that were recorded.  It is
also possible that material was edited out of the lectures which
are available.  If anyone has a set of the original reels, please
post any missing material.

========================

9ACC file 15/35

9th ACC 12 (13) - ONE-WAY FLOWS IN PROCESSING

Transcript of lecture by L. Ron Hubbard 9ACC12    -   
5412C22 Renumbered 13 for "The Solution To Entrapment"
cassettes

ONE-WAY FLOWS IN PROCESSING

A lecture given on 22 December 1954


Where we have the processes of communication being run on a
preclear, we should be very fully aware of the consequences
in terms of somatic and particularly that part of the
Auditor's Code which says in it "Do unto preclears, in a
direction to get them well, by continuing to run the
process which is getting change."

Now, there's some very weird, weird things in Communication
Processing that you will run into. Fortunately there is
such a scarcity of all points of the communication curves,
such scarcity that it doesn't much matter which side you
run, for a while. But then they start balancing themselves
out one way or the other and you have to get more precise
as to which side you run.

Let me give you a couple of examples. We start running Joe
Doakes and we will discover at once that he will turn on
some of the more interesting front-of-the-body somatics. He
will turn these on because nobody ever acknowledges
anything from behind him and so we get an unbalanced
potential between the front and the back of the body. So
that if you continue to run this process on the front of
the body only, you will continue to pull things in from the
back and that's what he's been doing for an awfully long
time. The more he acknowledges, the more he talks in one
direction only, the more somatics he is going to pull in
from the back.

Now, why did we exteriorize a guy from the rear? Why do we
say be three back of your head instead of three feet in
front of your face? Do you know that a great many more
people would exteriorize if you said be three feet in front
of your face? They would go out swoosh! What are they
traveling on? They're traveling on the stuck one-way flow
that has been fixed there. They have been traveling on that
consistently and continually.

Now, did you ever listen to a tape or a lecture of mine,
turned around with your back to me? It's very possible that
some somatics turned on when you did that. Why would this
occur? It is simply because it's such an unusual angle to
have acknowledgments and greetings and so forth from.

The greeting which one ordinarily gets from behind his head
is crunch! Therefore one distrusts this side of
communication entirely and as he looks back of him he has a
total unreality. This is the first condition that you know
will exist with a preclear. Let's look at this. We find out
that the stuck flow got stuck and stuck and stuck and
finally the privates didn't believe there was a general and
the general didn't believe there were any the privates.
Now, there is what occurred in the communication line. In
other words, that stuck flow passed right straight on
through to reality, solid agreement on through to utter
unreality but still solid. Didn't believe he was there.
Didn't believe it was there.

What postulate do you suppose people have made about their
backs? They just kept on supposing nobody was there. They
hoped nobody was there. You see that? So, they reduce the
reality of the back of the body swiftly. They reduce this
reality perforce, quickly by their own postulates, aiding
and abetting the communication formula saying "I hope
nobody is behind me. Nobody better walk in from that quarter."

We have so many stories and legends in the society such as
those of Wild Bill Hickok who was an impervious gent. He
used to turn bullets with his teeth with no difficulty
whatsoever. I think he did for about seventy-six men. He
was - he was Wild Bill all right. And Wild Bill Hickok,
however, one day sat down and was dealt a hand and one of
the most despicable little hoods that had ever been spawned
in that particular area, simply walked up and blew his
brains out. Well, he had been fooled by his friends. His
friends, by the way, had fooled him by making him sit, that
one time, with his back to the door instead of his back to
the wall.

Most everybody is more comfortable with his back to the
wall than the back to the door. Well, that's a "hope
nobody's there." Well, they keep "hoping nobody's there"
and it balances - it imbalances the body potentials to such a
degree as to start flows in the vicinity of the body and
chop the body up.

Now, this weird segmentation that you run into of the
body - right to the left side as occurs in a paralytic
stroke, back to front, top to bottom - is simply
communication compartmentation, in other words, cut off of
communications.

Now, supposing we have one end of the body - one side of the
body, the front side, where - that everybody is saying "Oh
my, look, look everybody here I am. Here I am. I'm being
presentable," etc., etc., etc., you see, being presentable.
And the back side of the body, "Nobody better be here,
don't look." You get that? Now get this as two different
postulates for two different sides of the same organism and
see whether or not you get somebody self-auditing
eventually. A person is automatically making a game inside
the body, isn't he? He's therefore getting an automatic
introversion just by the fact that nobody must be behind
him and somebody has to be in front of him. And so we get
this poor guy eventually worried about himself. Just out of
this factor all by itself we get him worried about himself.
And because there's this much difference of potential and
we got a forward flow; reference Philadelphia Lectures
1952 - remember Philadelphia Lecture Series, the graphs of
flow.

The thetan lets go for a moment or loosens up in any way
and all of a sudden he's pushed further forward in the
body. And there isn't a psycho alive that you won't find,
eventually out in front of his face. They go out in front
of their faces forced by this lack of communication in the
rear, necessity for communication in front. And they move
on into the less tortured, less solid area driven by the
discharges of the stuck flow. In other words, the thetan
is overtly, by - simply by body potentials, driven forward,
first into the body, then through the body and then out in
front. And when he gets out in front then he doesn't know
what the dickens he is doing.

It's a very hard thing to be out in front of a body and to
put your visio lines back to the optic nerves. This is hard
to do. It's very hard to be out in front of the body and do
everything on a reverse basis - handle the body control. So
they stop handling the body entirely. And of course then
when you start processing one of these boys - although a
thetan is probably three feet in front of his face as a - as
a person, he is - has even disowned being himself and he is
not the body and nothing is in control. Psychosis could
simply be said "I am out of control of this manifestation."
So, if you got far enough out in front of the body, of
course you'd run out of control of it certainly, wouldn't you.

Now, a person is as well in control of the body as he is
situated where he can address immediately the scene before
him and the control centers, both in the same direction of
sight.

Now, let's - let's watch you sitting on a truck driving the
truck while sitting on the tailboard. Wouldn't that be
interesting? Let's have a couple of little periscopes and
let's fix it up so that you actually can sit on the
tailboard of the truck and look forward as to where the
truck is going. Let's fix that up. Do you realize that you
still have to handle the controls of the truck in some
weird and impossible fashion? See, everything is the other
way to. Now, we don't say that a thetan can't look both
ways. But remember the body, the truck, is looking - it's the
one that imposes this - it's looking in a certain direction,
isn't it? Well, now you could drive a truck from the
tailgate with great ease, if you simply could look at the
road and look at the controls, both in the same direction
and yet could monitor the controls. It would be as easy to
drive this truck from the tail as from the seat actually.
But not if you thought you were facing the other way. Well,
did you ever watch cattle in a high wind? They don't walk
into it - horses and so forth - they turn their faces away from
it, don't they?

What is this energy flow - a difference of potentials - but a
sort of highwind. See, it's a high wind that's passing from
the back massive potential, you see. No communication
equals barrier. Barrier equals potential discharge on an
electronic basis. All right, so we have this potential
discharge sitting behind the guy and we have an area to
discharge into sitting in front of the guy because it's
being vanquished all the time. In other words, it's being
melted down, you might say. He's saying "hello" and he's
thinking and other people are saying things to him and he's
drinking and saying "hello" to the bottle and you know he's
in communication up here, he's not in communication back
there and so we get this forward flow. It's a high wind to
a thetan. And he will fight against it so long trying to
shut off the back - the flow. But now, all of a sudden he
decides that there isn't anything he can do about this flow
anyhow. It's out of control. At this moment he'll find
himself facing the direction of flow. The cattle finally
evolve into buffalo and buffalo always face in to the wind.
This is a wild one. Buffalo's got no sense at all, he no
sense at all. And he'll stick his face into the wind. Any
northern starts blowing - as a matter of fact he's tried to
compensate for it now by growing hair up around his
haunches and forward part of his body, shoulders, so that
he can brave this meanwhile with his wind - with the wind
tearing his eyeballs out. This is the state of a thetan
who is having a hard time controlling the body.

What does this have to do with ability? Supposing you were
standing on the tailgate of a truck and running the truck
perfectly competently. Now, supposing you're out in front
of the truck and you're looking back at the motor, back at
the controls, and you're just faced in that direction
fixedly. And you're supposed to drive this truck forward
towards yourself. Who would you think was under attack?
You'd sure think you were. And what's going to happen the
first - the first thing that gets bitten there is thee.

The body could be called a barricade, a barrier, something
to protect an individual, a thetan. Well, it certainly
doesn't protect him anymore when he's out in front of it
looking back at the face trying to monitor the motor
control centers - it certainly doesn't make sense to him
anymore. He's under attack. This body is not protecting
him. He has to get rid of it, etc. He can't control it. It
can't control anything else. It can't protect him from
anything and there he is.

Basically, where did all this begin? Well, it began by a
lack of acknowledgment on the part of a body of the
presence of a thetan who had spoken to it. That's where it
begins. That's actually the facts. That is where the whole
trouble started. There's this body standing there, you
know, an animal; and it was standing there and the thetan
says "What are you doing around here?" The thetan says
"What the hell are you doing around here? Hey! I'm talking
to you! Spat!" He instantly tried to touch that much no
communication - he went out of communication.

You will find these facsimiles sitting around the track in
any preclear. He'll have - he'll have a bright visio of a
body standing there. It's a stuck visio. Right after it
there is blackness. He moves from an area of communication
where he is possibly communicating, you see, it's possible
for him to communicate into an area of relatively low
communication. And the first thing that this will do to him
is tell him that he's out of communication and he will go
into a sort of an apathy about the whole thing. He'll say
"Look, I am out of communication."

The moment you put a beam on a body to swat it or nip it or
something like that, you're in trouble because it's an
out-of-communication mechanism, and so is a trap of sorts.
Now, we have somebody inside a body and we say to him "How
are you Joe?" As an auditor we get into the same damn
condition this thetan got into when he was outside trying
to make that body talk. Right? Huh? Only we're civilized
enough so that we don't go swap! We simply take his valence
and somatic. Look at that real good. Any ally that your
preclear is interiorized into valencewise, any ally, was
badly out of communication if there has been a swap of
valences. Look that over. Any ally whose characteristics
your preclear has, was an out of communication character.
And yet this preclear will remember that this ally was
kind, friendly, good to him, that this person did speak to
him, did greet him, did listen to his troubles,
yap-yap-yap-yap-yap, until we start running the
communication formula on him. You say, 'All right. Have
that - have that ally stand up there. Have Grandma stand up
there and start saying 'okay."'

"Why she never said okay in her life. She never said yes or
no or okay or anything like that."

One I ran into - this is an actual case - I had the preclear
say - had the ally say yes and no, just those two things: yes
and no. All of a sudden the preclear says "You know,"
because this preclear was very indefinite - you'd ask this
preclear, "Do you want a drink of water?" - preclear was
obviously in that ally's valence, you see. Some ally's
valence who was very unpositive. So, I just started looking
around for allies and had him mock up one saying yes and no
just as a wild shot in the dark and hit it right square on
the head. And this preclear says, "You know, that person
had no dignity at all. Grandpa had no dignity. None!
Because he never gave a positive answer to anything. Any
time you'd come in and say anything to Grandpa, he'd give
you a lot of drivel. It was all superconditional.
Everything was all conditional on all other things and
these things were conditional on other things and he'd tell
you all about the conditions and you'd finally walk off
without any yes or no. And you eventually - I got kind of
frantic trying to get Grandpa to say something about
something."

But Grandpa ran out. There was his communication freak. He
would, he would answer, he would greet. He would originate
communications and tell stories. He was a nice guy. But the
only thing that he did that was completely off the beat was
some sort of an obsessive explanatory line instead of an
acknowledgment. See, a conditional acknowledgment. There
was no actual communication inflow and all there was, was a
conditional sort of a blather outflowing.

"Well, you remember what happened the last time I gave you
a nickel." See?

"Grandpa, can I have a nickel?"

"Well, you remember the last time I gave you a nickel. You
remember what happened, you got that bag of candy and you
got in trouble with your mother," and so forth and so forth
and so forth and so forth and so forth. "I remember when I
was a little boy I had to get out and I had to get out and
polish shoes every time I wanted a nickel," and
yappity-yappity-yappity, yappity-yappity-yappity-yappity,
yappity-yap until the subject of the conversation was either
forgotten or Grandpa would simply hand over a nickel after
saying for fifteen minutes that there was no slightest
possibility of doing this, you see. And this trick all by
itself had, well it was aided and abetted by the fact that
Momma was continually telling this particular preclear that
he mustn't be like Grandpa, making an enforcement on the
other side. But actually this communication block was the
main factor because when it was resolved he all of a
sudden went out of Grandpa's valence. Flip! He says, "It's
very funny. He's going away, he's going a - . Where the hell
is he?"

He all of a sudden did a separation of universes. Now,
remember how long we worked for a separation of universes
with 8-D? It's a long time, hm? Well, Communication
Processing will give you a separation of universes in a
rather a short period of time.

Well, let's get back and look at this thing, then, and we
find out that this individual is very forcefully stuck - face
on. See, he's stuck toward the face and not much stuck
toward the back. And if he's not much stuck toward the back
then he's going to be driven from the back, isn't he? If he
mustn't - if he never puts his attention upon his back he's
going to be driven away from his back.

Here's a process which exteriorizes a preclear
consistently. I won't say in how many hours but it's a very
finite number of hours. Is you merely have hello and
goodbye, hello and goodbye and yes and no and okay and all
right behind him. And you just run it behind him for a
little while and the next thing you know he's starting to
get calm. You wonder why he's getting calm. As a thetan
he's no longer holding onto these masses of energy which
are holding onto masses of energy which are holding onto
masses of energy because he's liable to slip out through
the front of his face. And this in itself is a tension and
an anxiety.

So, let's just take this body pole which is the
noncommun - most noncommunication area of the body - if you've
noticed while I've been running these processes on you in a
group you've gotten, quite often, bad somatics back here on
the back of the head or the neck. I was making the back of
the head say "hello" there in one group processing session.
That's a horrible thing to have happen.

Funny part of it is when you've knocked flat that back
potential of the body, several things occur to the body. It
is not a natural state of affairs for the body to be faced
so thoroughly forward - not a natural state of affairs. The
body should be able to relax, should be able to dance
backwards and move backwards. And did you ever run into a
dancing partner that could not dance backwards? You girls?
You guys, I wonder if you ever danced backwards. A girl has
no other choice. She is always being pushed backwards by
her partner. That's right isn't it?

All right. If you were to just reduce this - well, now let's
forget about a thetan and let's just look at this object
called a body and if you were to reduce from behind the
body this tremendously solid potential that's there so as
to reduce this flicker and flow. You'll find out a little
kid doesn't have this by the way. It's not there. He holds
his looks rather well. And right up to the age maybe of - not
necessarily everybody, but the majority - hold the body shape
up to twenty-one, something like that. And then something
starts happening to the body shape.

What does happen to the body shape? This back potential is
charging up, charging up, charging up, no communication, no
communication. And the front of the body is outflowing,
outflowing, outflowing, outflowing and the body starts to
distort - face, chest and so forth all start to distort. Now,
you want to put that back in shape again, you want to put
that back in shape again, why, all you'd have to do would
be to run hello, goodbye and okay and so on. Just have him
keep mocking them up. Have the back of his head say hello a
few times to the small of his back and the small of his
back acknowledge and you'll find out that with great ease
he'll go into a scattering and this you must keep him out
of. He'll go into a scattering of communication with great
ease. Something is saying yes and something else is saying
no and something is saying hello and the acknowledgment
pattern - the curves aren't being run at all and it just
starts to get more and more random so you have to start
policing a preclear.

Why does it get this random? Well, that is why it is a
bundle or a mass. It is that random, you see. It was so
random that it eventually balled up into a ball, and so we
would simply reduce this mass of energy at a person's back
and tell him to be three feet out of his head. That's very
modern exteriorization. We just work on him until we
reduce this mass of energy. We don't worry about pushing
him out of his face. Of course the fact of the matter is he
could go on out of his face. But do you know that if he has
to desert this body without exerting his control over it or
without being in control of it, he will exteriorize in such
a degraded state that you won't be able to do anything
with him. He'll go back in, too.

So, let's look it over and find out that most people are
making a game out of the body by having half of the body,
just mechanically, have one-half of the body being against
the other half of the body. The front half of the body has
to resist backwards, of course, against this flow which is
there. The back of the body feels - it feels as though it's
pressing forward and is trying to attack the front of the
body giving people a sort of a manic attitude about life.
They have to get going, they don't have any time, they have
to get things done. They're being driven. You see, all
these oddities of computation that could result.

Well, the final analysis is that the body does not have to
be a set of electrical potentials of this artificial
character. It has a set of electrical potentials and you
could take these apart with the communication formula.
These potentials however, are its anchor points. And these
anchor points are corroded to the degree that they are out
of communication. Quite cute. See, they're as black and as
forgotten as they out of communication.

So, as you are running toward a person's back you'll find
that eventually the tractor character of the body itself,
the in pull (like gravity of the body itself) when released
permits the anchor points of the body to go out where they
belong. Where do they belong? Well, there's one planet up
the line which has a body type not unlike Homo sapiens.
They're not unlike it. Possibly they're many anatomical
differences, maybe the glandular system is differently
placed or something like this, you know, that could be. But
it's two eyes, two arms, two legs, very good physical form
from a Greek standpoint and from a human being standpoint
they - here on Earth, one would look at these people with
considerable amazement and say "My lord, where did that
beautiful man come from? Where did that beautiful woman
come from? Whee!"

Well, I wouldn't know exactly, never having taken a foot
rule from Earth to this other planet, what the relative
size is. I wouldn't be able to tell you. I believe though
from relative gravities and so forth that these people are
maybe just a little bit bigger, maybe seven feet tall,
something like that. But their anchor points are miles out,
miles out. And Homo sap has his anchor points feet out. And
when the fellow's in pretty good shape they're yards out.
When they're in pretty good shape they're yards out. But
it's quite an amazing difference here, quite an amazing
difference. Now, if you can get somebody's anchor points
out to something like a decent, proper or normal, not a
normal but a decent or proper range you would find out that
his comfort would markedly increase. He would be more
comfortable. He would also be more calm and the body would
be far more obedient and much less afraid.

All right. The mechanical aspect simply of an individual
talking or communicating front all the time will
eventually wind the body up in the soup, but what do we
care about this? What do we care about it? If we know
Communication Processing, we don't give a damn about how
much we would outflow in one direction. We wouldn't care
how many stuck flows we set up around him. There's no
liability to a stuck flow. So, you look around and you find
the flows stuck so you throw some hellos into it. You throw
some acknowledgments into it. In other words, you just
patch it up.

The routine procedure of auditing would be to exteriorize
somebody and put him - put him in pretty good condition and
make his liability of being snatched up again by the body
rather less, huh? Well, if you put a preclear into that
condition, then you'd have him there, wouldn't you? And
supposing you'd processed him a lot on this process, he
really couldn't help but learn how to do this process.
Sooner or later along the line he'd get a little bit
cockier, triumphant about this thing, you know. He won't
care what he gets into. Runs into a theta trap, starts to
knock his valence around one way or the other and starts
having the corners of the trap say hello, okay, thank you,
goodbye. The thetan will be able to say goodbye. Theta
trap? What the hell is a theta trap? Get the idea? Now
naturally with a good solid workable process you would get
toward a good solid workable existence. But remember
something, a thetan loves a game. This is where it all
gets booby-trapped beautifully.

He loves a game. He'll accept this impossible, goofball
condition of opposite terminals on the body, both smashed
together real tight, everything out of communication and
flows going in all directions and death and old age and by
the way I'll make a remark there; old age is directly
traceable to the imbalance of potential terminals in the
body, imbalance of terminal potentials in the body to be
more accurate. You say this is old age, this is old age,
too. The cells don't get old. The body is doing what it is
supposed to do it thinks, run this cycle, you see.
And - however it is aided and assisted by these buildups to
such a very marked degree that it is these buildups will
increase its agedness. Let's take such as thing as a few
wrinkles in the face, something like that. They are held
there by these noncommunication ridges. And if you want to
knock them out why then just knock out the opposite ridge.

But let me give you a very positive clue in processing
this; another slight aside here. There's a positive thing
about processing this. He is normally least fixated upon
the most damaging terminal. It has already gone through the
cycle of utter unreality - to utter unreality. See that? It
is already utterly unreal, the most damaging terminal there
is. And it is outflowing at him. It is driving him away
from it. These hollow spots, heh! in the body, these
hollow spots, these nonexistent parts of the body. These
anaesthesed areas of the body and so forth will be looked
upon as fairly safe by the preclear because he doesn't
believe anything is there. And then start processing them
and my golly they get more darn solid than anything he has
ever experienced; and painful.

Now, let's take a case of gallstones that turns on and off
you know? All of a sudden one day the guy has gallstones.
Then he gets better and then he has gallstones. And then he
gets better, and he has another attack of gallstones.
You - the opposite is happening there to what you would
think. There is an out of communication area in the
vicinity of the gallbladder, which is, you know, it's real
out of communication. The guy starts to go into contact
with it by a jolt or something like this, he starts to go
into contact with it, starts communication with it, and
then flicks right away and stops communication. So, he
gets a gallbladder attack. Why? He reactivated it into some
solidity and it dramatizes solidity for a little while. And
he says, "That's too painful," goes out of communication
with it again and the gallbladder attack subsides.

What do you think is going to happen in processing? Well,
if you were to just take a lick and a promise with this
process and then walk away, your preclear is liable to get
sick from something. So what, he's just a preclear. But at
the same time, he's liable to get sick from something. So,
when you start to run out a process of this character, you
must be very well aware of the fact that you should
continue it until it is very flat. As I told you earlier
this - in this lecture, you want to make very, very sure that
you run it as long there is process change going on. And
that can be quite awhile. You don't have to run it all in
the same session but you certainly should get back at it
again. Don't be surprised if he developed aches, pains and
ills that he had never heard of before as far as he was
concerned while the process is being run. So what! If he
thought it over he would remember faintly and vaguely
having had a twist of this when he was a kid, see, he
would remember this.

Now, areas, then, which are unreal and which have gone
entirely out of communication are the danger areas.

All right, now let's take up the rest of this thing called
communication. This is a heck of a thing we're into because
the recognition of anything and the communication with
anything to any degree at all is going to result in peace,
not war. The harmful masses, the various factors which can
fight a person or which a person can fight, these things
are all going to get down into a very low state of action.
No conflict. This may be bad. This may be real bad from
your preclear's standpoint who is losing his game. If all
the game he thought he had was this game of swapping
terminals inside the body; "Well, I just can't go to work
today, my lumbago hurts too much." Game. Big game.

We have such a character around and it is a peculiarly,
well, it's a fag. Not around this operation, but I mean
there's one around town that I could get hold of and
process with no difficulty at all. All I'd have to do is
just start telling him to go east and west as the case may
be, and touch a few walls and this person would start on
out of it. He would find some other terminals besides
these body terminals to fool around with. But, this
person - this person is beneath my game acceptance level
quite markedly. This person makes the most fabulous game
out of a somatic, just fabulous. You never saw so much
invested interest, so many ramifications developing out of
a hangnail. They just go on and on and on.

This person blames his ills for every tragedy that occurs
throughout the land. Pope gets sick, it must have been
because he had a bum foot. I mean, he's real bad off from
this standpoint. This boy's body must be the most seething
mass of mismatched and imbalanced terminals anybody ever
ran into. But he sure makes a game out of it.

Well, remember that some certain determinism can exist
around this subject of the game. Therefore, if we start
discharging body terminals, madly, at random, knocking them
all out, we might - not necessarily true that we would but we
might - run into a scarcity of games. So we would have to
come in with this process: "Mock up somebody else inventing
some games for you," or "Mock up somebody else inventing
some games," which will demonstrate to him immediately an
enormous resistance to games which other people invent.
These are dangerous. Or, "Invent some games just as a
preclear." Of course, it's the preclear that is inventing
the games all the way around, but he's got it figured out
as a game of how we invent games.

We could also have him - have other people invent games - have
somebody else invent games for other people. I mean, we
could run a full bracket on this. Just because we have
moved this far into communication is no reason why we have
utterly deserted some of the factors which we know about,
such as brackets and so forth.

All right. As soon as he started doing this you would
probably develop some of the larger comm lags. Now, what's
curious is that you would process him into communication
physically and then discover a comm lag on games had
increased. That is a curiosity. See this? This is a real
curiosity.

We start processing him and we have him mocking up origins,
acknowledgments, answers and we just have him doing fine
and he's just going along swimmingly and obviously this
person should be getting into better and better
communication. On the process that we are running on him,
his lag is getting less and less and less. He's getting in
better and better shape, obviously. Obviously. And then we
say, "Invent a game." And we find out that if we'd ask him
this question before he started this process - and we may,
this isn't necessarily true but I've observed this, limited
number of cases, about three cases - I had a shorter lag on
"Invent some games" before I ran Communication Processing.
And after I had him run Communication Processing for a
while, we had really developed some honeys, some beautiful
communication lags just on one subject only: games.

Well, we have just been chewing up all of his automaticity
on the subject of games with Communication Processing.
Because, remember, to have a game you have to cut
communications. That's the first thing you've got to do.
One of the first actions in a war, one of the more
nonsensical games - war is nonsensical because the people who
are being made to play it haven't been asked. That's the
only thing wrong with a war.

I remember this thing - greetings - that was being sent out
by selective service and by draft boards in other lands and
so forth, was not necessarily an invitation to a game. It
didn't say in it anyplace that you have the - it - there was 
no R.S.V.P. on it. There was none, not one. I looked them
over, looked them over very carefully. As a matter of fact,
I had so many more interesting things to do in 1940 and 41,
that the introduction of a war at that time was not
according to my plan or calendar and was very upsetting to
me, and so on. And I remember telling - I wasn't drafted, I
just knew what inevitably would occur and I'd better have
something to do with it. And but I remember that I better
have something to do with it while I still had some free
choice in the matter rather than afterwards when I didn't
have any. And I remember very well telling the admiral in
charge of the navy yard where I reported in, picked up a
commission, "You know, you're going to have a war and I am
at least trying to - trying to exercise some discretion as to
what part I am playing in this war, and that's the only
reason I am here."

And he said, "War! Umph, umph, nonsense, umph." October,
no, it was July the 25th, 1941. "War," he says, "war."

I said, "Yes," I said, "you have a very great scarcity of
officers, admiral, did you know that?"

"Why, nonsense, we're training twelve a month." Twelve a
month he was training!

Well, anyway, he didn't ask anybody whether or not
he - nobody asked anybody whether or not they would like to
play this game. And I think self-determinism gets violated
in a war. Maybe, maybe the only thing we find wrong with
war is war's alternate name would be "violation of
self-determinism." It's a peculiar kind of a game.

But, the first thing they do when they declare war is to go
out and cut everybody's cables. Of course, when Santa
Domingo was almost at war with the US, and was at war with
the US, and so forth, I remember a report coming in that
they even, when they haven't got any cables to cut, they
even invent them. A fellow came in and reported to
intelligence down there in Santa Domingo, that the wireless
to the United States had been cut. Native, a very sincere
fellow. He was trying to get the game on the road too. In
other words cut communications. This is the first act,
first dramatization of a nation involved in war; severs
entirely communication with the enemy which is a silly
thing to say the least, but it couldn't have a war if it
didn't. It imposes immediate censorship boards on all
cables. Those cables which it doesn't censor it simply
overtly goes out and digs up and cuts in half.

The Indian, declaring war on the white man - the white man
civilization and so forth - was always at work cutting his
telegraph lines. It's necessary to cut communications in
order to have a war. It's necessary to cut communications
in order to have a reduction in determinism. Remember
there's a parallel fact there. The area you can determine
or influence is directly regulated by the amount of
communication you have into that area no matter how
painful it may be to you. Remember that. The determinism
of the actions in that area directly and immediately
depends upon the amount of communication you've got into
that area.

And the answer is more communication, not less.

Now, you can ignore, you can ignore, bypass, forget about
and so on, a certain type of communication if you have
nerve enough to continue to ignore it. How much nerve does
that take? In the case of a body, a tremendous amount. You
could ignore it, you see, if you are willing to take the
kickback. But you can't cut communications with it. Now, do
we get the difference between cutting communication and
ignoring communication? There is a distinct difference.

I see all too often people in the HASI confusing these two
points. They don't know what it is to ignore a
communication as compared to cutting a communication. You
would let a communication line you were ignoring simply
flow. You see, you would just let it flow, you simply
wouldn't pay any attention to it. And you would find that
if you could do this, and if you could bear the fact that
it was continuing to flow, and if you just didn't pay any
attention to it at all, it would get thinner and thinner
and weaker and weaker and for lack of a terminal, expire.

It would be something like the tentacle of an octopus
reaching for you while you were in a cave, you see, if you
could ignore it. But if you started to fight it so as to
cut it off, you would of course be in immediate contact
with it, wouldn't you. Cutting communication almost always
dictates the policy of going into communication on an overt
level. This is entirely different than ignoring a
communication.

It's almost impossible to really ignore a communication but
cutting one is to fight it, chop it, locate it, get active
about it, see? Cut communication can be a very interesting
game, very adventurous. But it makes a game and it makes a
fight and it makes another determinism, and you will find
out that you are no longer capable of determining the
action of that thing which you are trying to cut the
communications of or which you are ignoring. You will find
yourself unable to determine the action of it. That's a
fascinating fact. If you start to go out of communication
with the body. You see, the practices of Gautama Buddha,
and so forth, are all based on ignoring the communication.
And that's a very frail type of process. Don't think of
separateness, don't think of space, don't think of energy,
oh, he has about twelve categories there. And you mustn't
think of any one of these things and if you do, why you'll
be in, I don't know, crystal heaven, or something of this
sort, with no ado, no more ado you'll be there. Yes, that's
absolutely true. The thoroughness of ignoring
communication, however, to this degree, is an impossible
degree for nearly everyone.

And for that reason you have not had here on Earth much
success evolving from Eastern philosophies and practices.
They are very unsuccessful. Because they are based on
ignoring communication. See, "I will sit here on this bed
of spikes," - fakirism. Or, "I will sit here on this mountain
top and just be alone, silent, quiet, ignoring all the ills
and everything. And out I will fly." But my buddies in this
particular field discovered another phrase they could have
said after they had done that for awhile, "Down I will spin."

Now, therefore and thereby and therein and thereas,
communicating overtly with something brings about a
determinism. If you desire to communicate, not punish, if
you desire to communicate and then merely start, stop,
change, in other words, the monitor of control, still
keeping in mind the fact that it will survive too, you
could very easily determine the course and existence of
such an entity as the German Reich or the Kremlin. No, no,
no difficulty with this.

It's fighting it, it's cutting the communication with it,
it's being overt about how we mustn't communicate with
this, you see, that piles up energy which isn't channeled
and has no place to go and so makes masses, so makes
screens, makes detachments and separatenesses by
energy - uses energy to make things separate. You see how
this would be? We start fighting communication with the
German Reich. We start fighting communication with the
Kremlin. And they'll build up energy ridges and energy
ridges and energy ridges. The only thing that could happen
as a good end of this would be that eventually Russia would
forget all about the Western Hemisphere and the Western
Hemisphere would forget all about Russia. They wouldn't
even know they existed. There'd just be this enormous
energy ridge.

Then someday somebody would accidently go into
communication with this unknown something or other, you
see, and it would start to discharge in its direction and
then there'd be hell to pay for a short time until they got
the dam up again. And you'd get this same thing as a
psychosomatic illnesses with an unknown cause. Russia would
be suffering certain difficulties internally. She would
start suffering fascinating little difficulties inside the
government and with its trade and with other things. It'd
definitely she would know she was sick every once in a
while. You know, there'd be these kind of convulsions. So
would the United States, so would the Western culture
discover itself slightly in difficulty every now and then
and would not quite be able to trace exactly how this would
be. But this would be the result of a thoroughly cut
communication line, overtly held cut, too. 

Now, let's take the other part of it and find out if Russia 
were anxious and able, if she were really able to go into 
communication with the United States and were to continue in
communication with the United States on a very direct line.
All the kinds of activities one could engage in to continue
this communication line, we would find out eventually that
any animosity would blow up in smoke and any control they
were trying to exert on the United States would be a
survival control. They would be upset because we had looked
like we had a depression coming on and their economic
experts would sit around and wonder what they ought to do
about it. You see?

Similarly, the United States would become concerned that
the Ukraine wheat crop wasn't quite so good, and we might
even engage in sending over some wheat experts, or
something of this sort, to do something about this or - you
know?

Such a communication line as this had already begun in the
late twenties. We were sending a great many engineers into
Russia. But the difficulty was they were not sent in with
the government's blessing. They were sent in, they were
hired by Russia. The communication was instigated by
Russia; it was not by free offer on the part of the US
government, in other words the communication was somewhat
limited. Then we started to go into communication very
overtly with Russia during the war, didn't we? Started into
communication, made it partial, drew off and so set up a
psychosomatic illness known as iron curtainism. The iron
curtain was the result of partial and then withdrawn
communication.

All right, let's say your preclear, your preclear wants to
get out of his body. The way to get out of his body isn't
ignoring it. The way to get out of his body would be to
control it in a survival direction. Control it, not to harm
it, but to make it live. And once he had reached anything
like success along this line, move out of it? Why I should
say so. There'd be no trick to moving out of it. "Move out
of my body? I'm not in it." This would be the immediate
response.

See how this would work? But an individual would have to be
in very free communication of it.

Now listen, a fight can't exist in the presence of
communication. It can't. A two-way communication cycle
starts running, a fight will evaporate.

Chinese recognize this. I saw a couple of coolies fighting.
One of them says, "Yap-yap," and the other one says,
"Yap-yap." Chinese friend speaks up and on the query as to
whether or not these - why they weren't hitting each other.
And the Chinese friend says, "Man who strikes first blow
admit he run out of ideas."

So, anytime you get a two-way cycle of communication going
it will go off into a big mutter. Men don't talk themselves
into a further fight. They can only one-way flow themselves
into a further fight.

If Momma or little Roger had any idea at all of
establishing communication with the other party involved,
there would be no domestic uproar. Had an example of this
made yesterday. Had an awful trouble keeping Diana off the
Christmas tree. See, I had already installed all around the
bottom of the Christmas tree an enormous number of plastic
balls and bells that could be taken off madly. And they had
her real beaten down by last night. And so this morning I
spent a little time making sure that we had a two-way
communication on the subject of this tree. Two-way
communication. In other words it was a one-way
communication going there which resulted in a war, a break
of communications, you see. And it broke communications
between Diana and a maid, a baby sitter who was there
yesterday, rather than the regular maid. And Diana and the
tree, and the tree and Diana, these were all separate, see.

First thing Diana does this morning is get herself nicely
stabbed with some of the tree needles, and so on. So we had
a long talk about the Christmas tree while I was eating
breakfast and we had a long involved conversation and took
some balls off of it and put some balls on the Christmas
tree, and I kept nagging her to get acknowledgments of what
I was saying, and finally she started nagging me to get
acknowledgments of what I was saying. Next thing you know
she started to look more alert and very happy about the
whole thing. She took a few balls off the Christmas tree
and put a few balls on and went off and played with
something else, see? She was in control of the Christmas
tree. This was an obvious fact. I imagine this is why
more - a lot of people get upset about Christmas, they have
been hit in the head too often with a Christmas tree.

All right, as we look over the general program of auditing
in relationship to communication, we discover that it is
the principle of the auditor to get the preclear into
communication with anything the preclear is not in
communication with.

Now, let's say an auditor was doing domestic relations.
It's an interesting thing, but you know you could go out
and set yourself up a shop, domestic relations. You could
be quite successful at it too. The gag in settling such a
thing would not be to advise the husband to leave the wife
or the wife to leave the husband or give a bunch of advice
on the situation. The way to handle the situation would
simply be to get both parties present and start them into
communication with each other and referee that
communication line and make sure that full communication
existed on both sides. In other words, make sure that
anything that was originated was listened to, that anything
that was listened to was answered, and any answer given was
acknowledged. And then reverse end to. And you could
actually force two people - you say the use of force, it
would merely be the fact that they were there to be helped
anyhow that would serve as the force. You know what you
were doing. You're going to just referee this, you're just
going to get the husband, then, to say hello to the wife.
This is as dumb as this, you see. Not "State your
complaints," but to get him to say hello to the wife. And
then make the wife sit still long enough to have hello said
to, you see. And then have her answer back with anything;
just have her say okay. And then have him nod when she said
it. And then have her say, "How are you," and have him sit
still and then answer back, "I'm okay," and then have her
acknowledge the fact she'd been answered, you see. You'd
have a rough beef there for a little while. They'd both try
to blow the session and so forth. But when they wound up
they would find out that they were fairly good friends.

Now, knowing the full communication formula is very
aidative, one might say, in living a relatively unaberrated
life. If you just went on around, just knew it and sort of
built it into your social activities along this line. I   
I tried this the other day, by the way, you might find this
amusing. A fellow had been talking at me for some time.
He'd been talking at me and he'd been off the beat about
what he was talking about. And I finally tapped him on the
shoulder and I said, "Do you know that you have not gotten
any answer from me yet?" Grind. Crunch.

And I said, "Yes, now just pause a moment and I will answer you.

Well, the fellow wondered if I was crazy or something of
this sort and then he says, "Okay."

And I said, "Well that's just fine. You're perfectly right,
what you've been saying."

And he started to go off on it again and, "Wait, wait a
minute. Did you hear what I said?" And he says, "Yeah."

I said, "Okay. Now," I said, "it's my turn to originate a
communication."

And this guy acted for a little while so bashed in by this
whole deal that he was a little bit unsettled and he knew
that Hubbard was one of these psychology fellers or
something of the sort, he wasn't quite sure, that I did
originate a brief communication and back again. And about
fifteen or twenty minutes later we parted and we were very
good friends. He'd completely forgotten that he thought I
was crazy. See, we were very good friends and he was in
communication and he was actually stopping to get an
answer. And I imagine that's the first time in twenty years
he's ever stopped to get an answer or the first time he's
ever been forced to answer something that somebody has
said to him directly. Well, this is very punitive, wasn't
it. I mean, it wasn't processing the man. I wasn't
processing, I was simply enforcing communication. You
know, sort of on this basis, you know.

All right. I got - we had a very nasty situation here the
other day. Had nothing to do with the organization but
definitely had to do with personalities involved and man,
and some fellow did something, not part of the
organization, which was a very bad thing. Everybody was
keeping him definitely out of communication and they had
definite ideas about what should happen to him, see. All
right, I plowed him into communication again and told him
he had to straighten this situation up, told him what he
had to do, made him listen, made him acknowledge the fact
that he was heard, then made originate his explanation of
the situation, and so forth. He was goofy enough, spinny
enough so it was very, very difficult for him to get into
any groove on a two-way communication. But having simply
enforced a two-way communication upon him, this fellow all
of a sudden changed all of his attitudes concerning this
whole situation and rushed down to the hospital where this
victim was and apologized and is in communication with the
people involved and is going to pay the bills involved, and
so forth. All this by simply demanding that a two-way
communication take place.

In other words, the way to resolve the situation was
communication. But again, remember that we sure took a game
away from him. He didn't necessarily want this game but we
sure took a game away from him. The game of righteous
jealousy and so forth, all snapped out of his hands in a
hurry. But it wasn't snapped out of his hands by arguing
with him or by arresting him or by beating him up or
anything of this character. It was out of his hands in a
very simple way. It was simply talking to the guy and
making him talk, see, bang-bang-bang, with no violence
offered of any character. People do not offer violence in
the fact of communication ordinarily.

Now, on these body terminals, anything that has anything to
do with body terminals, we have known for a long time the
reason a thetan didn't exteriorize and the reason he went
back in had to do with body flows, hm? With the anatomy of
communication we have discovered body flow patterns and the
resolution of them directly by addressing and knocking out
of existence antipathetic terminals. Now, we've really
solved exteriorization when we ve done this, you see. We've
known for a long, long time that body flow patterns or
masses were responsible for nonexteriorization. So the clue
to this is to handle the terminals and null these obsessive
or compulsive flows inside the body. Quiet that all down,
square it all away, and remembering at the same time that
our boy is going to be minus just that many games because
every one of those terminals at one time or another was a
known game. It was sitting right out here in the material
universe at one time. And then he kept it as a token, and
then he mocked it up and kept it out of sight, and then he
hid it and then he didn't even know what it was and it
wasn't real to him anymore, but it's an old game.

And every psychosomatic ill, every disturbing facsimile,
anything you can think of is still an old game. Do you
imagine what kind of a game it was, the Fac One game. Just
think of it for a moment as a game. You know that your
preclear Fac One'd as many people as he was Fac One'd. He
was given a game from some other source.

Now, something on the matter of games; games from other
sources have landed your preclear in a great deal of
trouble, so one of the rougher things to process and
something you have to process is make somebody else mock up
games for him. He has to get over this antipathy. This is
his sole objection to games. He has no real objection to
games which he himself plays. But he has an objection to
games which he is being asked to play, because these he's
found dangerous.

He's just in - within - almost within his memory, just on the
tip of his recall, he walked into a place, he was on leave
or something of this sort, and there was this place and it
said, "we need volunteers," or something of the sort, and
he walked in through this large portal and there was this
huge, glowing stone sitting in the middle of a - of a big
room. And he walked in and he looked at it and that's the
last thing he knew. That was somebody else's game. The next
thing you know he was here on Earth. Zoom-zoom. Bang-bang.
So he has an antipathy to other people's games.

You must process these two things together. These two
things have to be processed together. If they are not
processed together, your preclear will do anything to flip
or foul up in some fashion; reinteriorize, get himself
involved in trouble one way or the other, go out and drive
madly down the street so he can get arrested, any kind of
weird thing that he himself will not quite be able to
rationalize, because remember, he doesn't know the
principles that you know.

Okay.

(end of lecture)





